Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alexandre Reco vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Reco vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Alexandre Reco vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Reco has won 52.24% of points on his second serve, while Broom has won 52.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Reco, in recent form, has won 54.61% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 56.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.98% and 31.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Reco has saved 60.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Reco has won 50% of matches played (W/L 16/ 16), with Broom winning 61.25% (W/L 49/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Reco has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 26/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 2/ 10). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Reco has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 16/ 16), where as Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Reco has played against opponents with an average rank of 172.72 while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 220.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Reco has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Reco has converted 44.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 36.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Reco 0 - 0 Broom
861
Rank
834
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
313
Rank
313
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
52% (56-52)
Career Total W/L
63% (205-118)
63% (10-6)
YTD W/L
63% (20-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$36,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alexandre Reco | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (10/6) | 63% (20/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (21/18) | 59% (46/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (187/185) | 53% (392/354) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 68% (13/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 198 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:56 | 1:54:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 154.38 | 203.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (767/1146) | 64% (1497/2329) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (499/767) | 70% (1054/1497) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (198/379) | 52% (436/832) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (48/109) | 37% (99/268) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (461/1150) | 41% (1030/2519) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (10/6) | 71% (15/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (10/16) | 63% (20/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 86% (6/7) | 57% (8/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 83% (18/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 17% (18/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 36% (14/5) |
Alexandre Reco Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Robert Strombachs
Player
Alexandre Reco
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Ewen Lumsden
73%
(
73 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Marcus Walters
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Matthew Summers
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
2 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Alexandre Reco
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
82%
(
53 of
65)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Alexandre Reco
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Emile Hudd
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
4
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
47 of
58)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Louis Dussin
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Axel Garcian
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Charlie Camus
64%
(
77 of
120)
1st Serve %
72%
(
87 of
121)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
121)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(3) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Robert Strombachs
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Finn Bass
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
George Houghton
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Reco Vs Broom Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
